Should college athletes be paid Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words

Should college athletes be paid - Research Paper Example The paper tells that since a long time, college athletes have been working with their hearts and souls day after day and year after year for the appreciation and name of their universities. The athletes are bringing huge money in their universities by their outstanding performances, television contracts and other deals. People, who are intrinsically motivated, possess the love for their work and they do not depend on any extrinsic reward for showing good performance. One can easily put athletes in this category. However, taking wrong advantage of this intrinsic motivation is common in most of the universities and colleges in the world. The people running these universities assume that provision of education in exchange of their phenomenal performance in sports is enough but this scholarship is not enough for those who give up their freedom and blood for a one-hour game. Apart from scholarship, they get nothing for their perseverance and struggle. If one goes in depth of this issue, o ne comes to know that athletes are responsible for running a huge business for the colleges and universities. Athletes play the same role for colleges as employees for organizations. One would hardly find any organization, which pays nothing to its employees who bring in a lot of business. Many people argue that it is more than enough if they get scholarship in exchange of their games and practice but the question arises, that can they survive on the scholarship money wholly. Scholarship money includes their college fee, tuition fee, and cost of books but what would they do for their food, entertainment, phone bills, laundry, and many other activities. Had they not been playing for the colleges they would do part time jobs and earn their livings but athletes require a huge time for practice without which they cannot give good performance and get scholarship from college. Scholarship is not just enough for what they give to their colleges. This is causing many athletes leave their co lleges without completing their education and getting into professional sports. Many colleges give bonuses to its teachers and scholars out of the money, which actually comes in because of undying energy and struggle of college athletes. Chris Weber is one of the athletes of University of Michigan; he had to struggle for money to watch a movie on the other hand the university bookshop was selling his uniform jersey for $50. College athlete must receive some sort of payment from the colleges they join or from the NCAA itself. Colleges should treat athletes as humans as they treat every other student. By not considering them the major reason of earning money and refusing to pay, the NCAA and its executives want the athletes to live a life which normal human beings cannot live. Normal humans want return of their efforts and NCCA is not giving this return. Some or other way NCCA itself is putting the college athletes at a disadvantage to not finish their college education and ruin their careers. Many people say that system is fine the way it is and there is no need of paying college athletes but they would understand the scenario only if they were at the place of these unfortunate athletes. One of the clearest examples of exploitation of college athletes is that of NCCA, which signed a contract of one billion dollar with CBS giving them right to broadcast all NCCA basketball tournament games played by their college athletes. Moreover, â€Å"NCAA has a multimillion-dollar yearly budget and it earns over $20,000,000 a year in television contracts† Murphy and Pace, n.p.). Concerning this, Hunter R. Rawlings III, president of the University of

Why Censorship is not the Best Option When it comes to Whistleblowers Essay

Why Censorship is not the Best Option When it comes to Whistleblowers like Wikileaks and why Citizens should not have access to all Information - Essay Example Wikileaks also promised to divulge important information about certain big companies in the United States and abroad. The documents leaked to the press by Wikileaks caused a lot of concerns among nations that many world leaders wanted to have the founder of Wikileaks, Julian Assange, arrested (Entous and Perez). While world leaders cried foul, many people around the world commended Wikileaks for informing the public regarding what governments and big corporations are doing. Many people believe that the public has the right to know what their leaders are doing and that Wikileaks must be allowed to continue providing the public with critical information without being censored (Lang). While some people see Wikileaks as a hero, others feel that the company has breached the bounds of decency and ethics for divulging damaging information without taking into considerations the consequences of its actions. Yet, despite the possible ethical breach on the part of Wikileaks, this does not mean that censorship of the press is the best solution to avert possible harm and prevent potentially embarrassing situations on the part of the government. There is no doubt that the right to information is very important but the question now is whether or not it is morally and politically correct for an organization like Wikileaks to spy on governments and big companies and divulge sensitive information to the public. In other words, to what extent should the public be kept informed about government transactions and when should the government be allowed to withhold information from its constituents. We have to understand that the public does not need to be a privy to all activities of the government and there are things that are better left unsaid to protect the people. Information is very powerful and it can make or unmake a company, a government, an organization or an individual. Since information is very powerful, there is a need to temper the sharing of information and use it only to promote the highest good (Thierer and Anderson). The right to be informed is very important so there is a need for people to be kept informed on the issues that affect them. In the case of Wikileaks, providing the general public with the right information is crucial so there is a need to scrutinize the kind of information that it gives to the general public. Note that certain types of information can cause a lot of damage and put the lives of people in danger. Potentially embarrassing leaks can lead to international tension and may lead to the breakdown of diplomatic ties of some nations. Allegations that the United States is selling nuclear arms to terrorists for instance are a very serious and it can create dangerous backlash. Publishing this kind of information without putting the information in the right context is very dangerous it can undermine the stability of certain nations. The idea that companies like Wikileaks can hack into the database of certain government offices a nd private companies is disturbing because any information that these companies generate can be used against the offices where the information came from. A clear example of this is what happened in Iraq when Wikileaks published sensitive Iraq war documents (BBC News). Note that Iraq had an inconclusive election in March of 2010 and the publication of the war documents added to the uneasiness in the area. According to Prime Minister Nouri Maliki, the war documents published by Wikileaks undermined the efforts of the Iraqis to form a strong government (BBC News). Although some political observers noted that the information published by Wikileaks did not seem to impress the majority of the people in Iraq (BBC News), there is